Los Angeles slips from worst US city for traffic list

For years, Los Angeles was almost interchangeable with traffic jams. The unending queues of vehicles on the I-405 and I-10, along with the daily standstills extending over long distances, and the relentless travel times gave the city a notorious reputation for its traffic woes. However, recent studies of city mobility throughout the U.S. have transformed this story. Los Angeles no longer holds the title of the most congested traffic city in the nation, signifying a significant change in urban transportation in the country.

The latest data on traffic trends suggest a reordering of the cities most affected by vehicle congestion. While Los Angeles remains among the most car-dependent cities in America, it no longer tops the list when it comes to time lost in traffic. This change reflects a broader transformation influenced by evolving work habits, investments in public transit, regional infrastructure developments, and urban planning efforts aimed at reducing gridlock.

One of the major reasons for this shift is the lasting impact of remote work, which dramatically increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many cities saw a gradual return to office life, hybrid and remote work models remain widespread. In Los Angeles, where commutes could easily consume several hours per day, many workers have continued to embrace flexible schedules, thereby reducing peak-hour congestion.

Moreover, transportation authorities in the greater Los Angeles area have launched and expanded projects designed to address long-standing traffic issues. These include highway expansion initiatives, improved traffic signal timing, and the development of alternative transit routes. Additionally, the Metro system has undergone expansions, offering more Angelenos the option to leave their cars behind, especially in neighborhoods that were previously underserved by public transportation.

Other cities have now surpassed Los Angeles in terms of traffic delays. Urban centers like Chicago, New York City, and Philadelphia are currently reporting longer average delays for drivers during peak periods. This can be attributed to a combination of increased economic activity, population density, aging infrastructure, and the limited capacity for road expansion in these older cities.

In contrast, Los Angeles, while sprawling and car-centric, has more room to adapt its road network and integrate smart traffic solutions. Technologies such as real-time traffic monitoring, dynamic tolling, and AI-assisted signal controls have begun to mitigate congestion levels across many L.A. corridors. While not a complete fix, these measures contribute to a steady improvement in traffic flow.

Another element influencing Los Angeles’ improvement in traffic congestion standings is the increasing reliance on micro-mobility alternatives. Scooters, bicycles, and e-bikes are gaining in popularity for short distances, especially in regions such as Santa Monica, Venice, and Downtown. Efforts promoting these means of travel, together with enhancements in infrastructure like wider bike lanes and designs that favor pedestrians, have reduced the city’s need for cars on every trip.

However, Los Angeles continues to grapple with major transportation challenges. The vast expanse of the metropolitan region and the deep-rooted reliance on automobiles result in congestion being a frequent problem for numerous residents, despite not being the worst in the country. Furthermore, the city needs to maintain a balance between the demands of personal vehicles and the necessity for a transportation network that is more sustainable, fair, and environmentally friendly.

Air quality concerns remain tightly linked to vehicle emissions, and traffic congestion exacerbates this issue. As the city seeks to improve livability, reducing overall car dependency will remain an essential priority. Transitioning to electric vehicles, expanding zero-emission bus fleets, and incentivizing clean transportation alternatives are all parts of the roadmap being developed by local agencies.

Interestingly, the drop in congestion rankings may not necessarily signal a dramatic reduction in traffic for Angelenos themselves—it could also reflect worsening traffic conditions in other urban areas. As more cities deal with surges in population, economic activity, and tourism, their infrastructure is being put under immense pressure. In some of these places, long-neglected upgrades to roads, bridges, and transit systems are only now being addressed, often resulting in short-term disruptions and longer commute times.

The changing rankings also emphasize that traffic involves more than just the road space; it’s a multifaceted problem connected to city planning, work habits, and policy choices. In places where a larger number of individuals are coming back to the workplace all the time, or where the public transit system is weaker, there’s been a stronger resurgence in traffic. At the same time, in Los Angeles, some of the lifestyle changes triggered by the pandemic—such as remote work and modified travel patterns—have persisted, contributing to a decrease in road congestion.

Considering the future, specialists in transportation caution that becoming complacent is not advisable. Although Los Angeles has lost its status as the city with the worst traffic congestion in the United States, it needs to maintain its current pace to prevent reverting to previous habits. To achieve sustainable progress, it is crucial to implement coordinated investments in infrastructure, promote land-use policies that support density around transit hubs, and persistently advance towards clean energy and mobility fairness.

At the same time, residents and commuters must be part of the solution. Embracing carpooling, supporting transit initiatives, and considering non-car modes of transport—even just a few times per week—can collectively make a substantial difference. Reducing congestion is not merely a technical or political issue; it is a cultural shift that involves every person navigating the city.

The improvement in Los Angeles’ traffic status should be seen not as the finish line, but as a sign of potential. It demonstrates that change is possible, even in a place long considered the epicenter of American car culture. By learning from what has worked and remaining proactive, Los Angeles can continue to evolve toward a more connected, accessible, and efficient transportation future.