Our website uses cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements (if any). Our website may also include third-party cookies such as Google Adsense, Google Analytics, and YouTube. By using the website, you agree to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Click the button to view our Privacy Policy.

How 10 brands maintain product value longer using circular business models

How 10 brands maintain product value longer using circular business models

What 10 brands have adopted circular business models?

A circular business model aims to keep products and materials useful for longer through repair, reuse, refurbishment, remanufacturing, and recycling. It also asks a commercial question: can a company earn revenue from maintaining what already exists, rather than relying only on the sale of new products?

The following 10 brands have made notable changes to how they design products, serve customers, or recover used goods. None is fully circular. Their examples show both the promise of the approach and the work still required to reduce waste and demand for new resources.

1. Patagonia: Repair and resale alongside new clothing

Patagonia’s Worn Wear initiative provides buyers with opportunities to return qualifying apparel and purchase pre-owned goods. Furthermore, the firm delivers repair services alongside maintenance advice designed to prolong the lifespan of each garment. Through these offerings, items like a jacket or backpack retain corporate value long after the initial transaction takes place.

The strongest circular benefit comes when a repaired or secondhand item replaces a new purchase. Shipping, cleaning, and repair still have impacts, however, so resale volume alone does not prove an overall environmental gain.

2. IKEA: Furniture buyback, resale, and spare parts

IKEA has introduced buyback services in participating markets, giving eligible furniture a route back into resale rather than disposal. Its secondhand offerings and spare-parts services address a practical problem: furniture is often discarded because a component is missing, a household moves, or an item no longer fits its owner’s needs.

The commercial model evolves from a one-time furniture sale to a service that facilitates ownership transfers and extends product usability. Triumph relies on resilient engineering, cost-effective gathering and transit, and proof that used items replace the creation of brand-new goods.

3. Interface: Recovering and remaking commercial flooring

Interface designs modular carpet tiles that can be replaced individually, so an entire floor need not be removed when one area wears out. Through its ReEntry program, the company collects eligible used flooring for reuse, recycling, or other recovery routes. It also incorporates recycled materials into some products.

This merges circular product design with a return mechanism tailored for business clients. Such a distinction is crucial: whereas recycled materials decrease the need for certain virgin resources, retrieving flooring at the end of its lifecycle ensures those components remain accessible for subsequent manufacturing phases.

4. Michelin: Tire management and retreading

Michelin offers commercial fleets tire-management services in which performance and maintenance matter alongside the initial tire sale. Its retreading business gives suitable truck-tire casings another useful life by replacing worn tread rather than discarding the whole tire.

For fleet operators, longer tire life can lower replacement costs and vehicle downtime. For Michelin, it creates an ongoing service relationship. The environmental case must account for total tire life, fuel efficiency, and disposal; retreading alone does not address every impact associated with tire use.

5. Renault Group: Refurbishing vehicles and batteries

Renault Group has expanded beyond new-vehicle manufacturing through activities that include vehicle refurbishment, parts recovery, and work on used electric-vehicle batteries. Its industrial refurbishment operations aim to return products and components to use where feasible, while its wider recovery efforts seek value from vehicles at the end of their lives.

A refurbished vehicle or component can preserve much of the value already invested in manufacturing it. Battery reuse requires particular care: a battery suitable for a less demanding application may still be useful, but its condition, safety, and remaining life must be assessed rather than assumed.

6. Philips: Refurbished medical equipment

Philips offers refurbished medical equipment, including selected imaging systems, as an alternative to buying new. Refurbishment can involve inspection, replacement of components, software updates, and testing before equipment returns to clinical use. Philips also works on service and equipment-life extension.

This represents a notable circular economy prospect since healthcare apparatuses often incorporate considerable amounts of resources and demand extensive work to produce. It also poses a tough challenge: any restored unit has to fulfill all relevant safety and functionality standards. Circularity must never compromise clinical dependability.

7. Fairphone: Phones designed for repair

Fairphone engineers mobile devices featuring swappable modules and commercializes replacement components, empowering users to perform numerous fixes themselves. This strategy couples hardware serviceability with a dedication to long-term firmware updates—a crucial factor, seeing as a functional handset loses its worth once its operating system grows obsolete or vulnerable.

Fairphone changes the usual smartphone calculation by treating a longer ownership period as a product feature. Its impact depends on how long customers actually keep their phones and whether repair remains practical and affordable.

8. Levi’s: Secondhand denim and alterations

Levi’s runs a pre-owned initiative for qualified used apparel, alongside offering repair and tailoring solutions via designated outlets. Resale grants pre-existing denim a second life with a new buyer, while adjustments enable owners to continue wearing pieces that require mending or no longer fit properly.

The model recognizes that durability is only useful when clothing stays in use. A returned garment may be perfectly wearable, but if it sits unsold—or if its buyer purchases the same amount of new clothing anyway—the benefit is smaller than the resale figures suggest.

9. Decathlon: Used sports gear and rental

Decathlon provides used athletic equipment, trade-in or buyback programs, and rental solutions across select regions. Such alternatives fit gear needed for a brief season, a fresh interest, or a growing youngster. Restoring a qualified bicycle for a new buyer, for instance, allows a costly, resource-heavy item to find a second life.

Rental can also let several customers use one product over time. Whether it reduces impact depends on utilization: equipment needs to be used enough to justify the transport, maintenance, and replacement involved.

10. Apple: Trade-in, refurbishment, and material recovery

Apple’s trade-in and certified refurbished programs give eligible devices paths into another period of use. For devices that cannot be reused, the company has developed disassembly processes, including its Daisy robot, to recover selected materials. Apple has also increased recycled content in parts of its product range.

These are distinct steps, not interchangeable claims. Keeping a functional device in use preserves more of its manufactured value than breaking it down for materials. Recycling remains important when reuse is no longer practical, but it cannot by itself offset the effects of frequent replacement.

Why do these modifications carry significance?

The examples span several business models: repair and resale, design for longer life, product recovery, refurbishment, and services that reward maintenance. Their results should be judged by more than the number of items collected or the amount of recycled content in a new product. Useful measures include:

  • The duration items stay in active service, alongside the frequency with which they undergo repair or change hands.
  • The extent to which a recycled or restored good genuinely offsets the creation of new inventory.
  • Whether the enterprise experiences a drop in virgin material demand enterprise-wide, rather than within a single product category alone.
  • The environmental footprint stemming from collection, transit, processing, and extra acquisitions stimulated by the initiative.

These brands show that circularity can change what a company sells and what it considers valuable. The deeper transformation is not simply offering a take-back scheme; it is building a business that benefits when products last, move efficiently between users, and require fewer new resources over time.

By Isabella Walker